Commit 386405f78661e0a4f82087196c7b084b8c612b48
1 parent
3ef693a0
documentation
git-svn-id: svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/trunk@45 c046a42c-6fe2-441c-8c8c-71466251a162
Showing
1 changed file
with
305 additions
and
0 deletions
qemu-doc.texi
0 → 100644
1 | +\input texinfo @c -*- texinfo -*- | |
2 | + | |
3 | +@settitle QEMU x86 Emulator Reference Documentation | |
4 | +@titlepage | |
5 | +@sp 7 | |
6 | +@center @titlefont{QEMU x86 Emulator Reference Documentation} | |
7 | +@sp 3 | |
8 | +@end titlepage | |
9 | + | |
10 | +@chapter Introduction | |
11 | + | |
12 | +QEMU is an x86 processor emulator. Its purpose is to run x86 Linux | |
13 | +processes on non-x86 Linux architectures such as PowerPC or ARM. By | |
14 | +using dynamic translation it achieves a reasonnable speed while being | |
15 | +easy to port on new host CPUs. An obviously interesting x86 only process | |
16 | +is 'wine' (Windows emulation). | |
17 | + | |
18 | +QEMU features: | |
19 | + | |
20 | +@itemize | |
21 | + | |
22 | +@item User space only x86 emulator. | |
23 | + | |
24 | +@item Currently ported on i386 and PowerPC. | |
25 | + | |
26 | +@item Using dynamic translation for reasonnable speed. | |
27 | + | |
28 | +@item The virtual x86 CPU supports 16 bit and 32 bit addressing with segmentation. | |
29 | +User space LDT and GDT are emulated. | |
30 | + | |
31 | +@item Generic Linux system call converter, including most ioctls. | |
32 | + | |
33 | +@item clone() emulation using native CPU clone() to use Linux scheduler for threads. | |
34 | + | |
35 | +@item Accurate signal handling by remapping host signals to virtual x86 signals. | |
36 | + | |
37 | +@item The virtual x86 CPU is a library (@code{libqemu}) which can be used | |
38 | +in other projects. | |
39 | + | |
40 | +@item An extensive Linux x86 CPU test program is included @file{tests/test-i386}. | |
41 | +It can be used to test other x86 virtual CPUs. | |
42 | + | |
43 | +@end itemize | |
44 | + | |
45 | +Current QEMU Limitations: | |
46 | + | |
47 | +@itemize | |
48 | + | |
49 | +@item Not all x86 exceptions are precise (yet). [Very few programs need that]. | |
50 | + | |
51 | +@item Not self virtualizable (yet). [You cannot launch qemu with qemu on the same CPU]. | |
52 | + | |
53 | +@item No support for self modifying code (yet). [Very few programs need that, a notable exception is QEMU itself !]. | |
54 | + | |
55 | +@item No VM86 mode (yet), althought the virtual | |
56 | +CPU has support for most of it. [VM86 support is useful to launch old 16 | |
57 | +bit DOS programs with dosemu or wine]. | |
58 | + | |
59 | +@item No SSE/MMX support (yet). | |
60 | + | |
61 | +@item No x86-64 support. | |
62 | + | |
63 | +@item Some Linux syscalls are missing. | |
64 | + | |
65 | +@item The x86 segment limits and access rights are not tested at every | |
66 | +memory access (and will never be to have good performances). | |
67 | + | |
68 | +@item On non x86 host CPUs, @code{double}s are used instead of the non standard | |
69 | +10 byte @code{long double}s of x86 for floating point emulation to get | |
70 | +maximum performances. | |
71 | + | |
72 | +@end itemize | |
73 | + | |
74 | +@chapter Invocation | |
75 | + | |
76 | +In order to launch a Linux process, QEMU needs the process executable | |
77 | +itself and all the target (x86) dynamic libraries used by it. Currently, | |
78 | +QEMU is not distributed with the necessary packages so that you can test | |
79 | +it easily on non x86 CPUs. | |
80 | + | |
81 | +However, the statically x86 binary 'tests/hello' can be used to do a | |
82 | +first test: | |
83 | + | |
84 | +@example | |
85 | +qemu tests/hello | |
86 | +@end example | |
87 | + | |
88 | +@code{Hello world} should be printed on the terminal. | |
89 | + | |
90 | +If you are testing it on a x86 CPU, then you can test it on any process: | |
91 | + | |
92 | +@example | |
93 | +qemu /bin/ls -l | |
94 | +@end example | |
95 | + | |
96 | +@chapter QEMU Internals | |
97 | + | |
98 | +@section QEMU compared to other emulators | |
99 | + | |
100 | +Unlike bochs [3], QEMU emulates only a user space x86 CPU. It means that | |
101 | +you cannot launch an operating system with it. The benefit is that it is | |
102 | +simpler and faster due to the fact that some of the low level CPU state | |
103 | +can be ignored (in particular, no virtual memory needs to be emulated). | |
104 | + | |
105 | +Like Valgrind [2], QEMU does user space emulation and dynamic | |
106 | +translation. Valgrind is mainly a memory debugger while QEMU has no | |
107 | +support for it (QEMU could be used to detect out of bound memory accesses | |
108 | +as Valgrind, but it has no support to track uninitialised data as | |
109 | +Valgrind does). Valgrind dynamic translator generates better code than | |
110 | +QEMU (in particular it does register allocation) but it is closely tied | |
111 | +to an x86 host. | |
112 | + | |
113 | +EM86 [4] is the closest project to QEMU (and QEMU still uses some of its | |
114 | +code, in particular the ELF file loader). EM86 was limited to an alpha | |
115 | +host and used a proprietary and slow interpreter (the interpreter part | |
116 | +of the FX!32 Digital Win32 code translator [5]). | |
117 | + | |
118 | +@section Portable dynamic translation | |
119 | + | |
120 | +QEMU is a dynamic translator. When it first encounters a piece of code, | |
121 | +it converts it to the host instruction set. Usually dynamic translators | |
122 | +are very complicated and highly CPU dependant. QEMU uses some tricks | |
123 | +which make it relatively easily portable and simple while achieving good | |
124 | +performances. | |
125 | + | |
126 | +The basic idea is to split every x86 instruction into fewer simpler | |
127 | +instructions. Each simple instruction is implemented by a piece of C | |
128 | +code (see @file{op-i386.c}). Then a compile time tool (@file{dyngen}) | |
129 | +takes the corresponding object file (@file{op-i386.o}) to generate a | |
130 | +dynamic code generator which concatenates the simple instructions to | |
131 | +build a function (see @file{op-i386.h:dyngen_code()}). | |
132 | + | |
133 | +In essence, the process is similar to [1], but more work is done at | |
134 | +compile time. | |
135 | + | |
136 | +A key idea to get optimal performances is that constant parameters can | |
137 | +be passed to the simple operations. For that purpose, dummy ELF | |
138 | +relocations are generated with gcc for each constant parameter. Then, | |
139 | +the tool (@file{dyngen}) can locate the relocations and generate the | |
140 | +appriopriate C code to resolve them when building the dynamic code. | |
141 | + | |
142 | +That way, QEMU is no more difficult to port than a dynamic linker. | |
143 | + | |
144 | +To go even faster, GCC static register variables are used to keep the | |
145 | +state of the virtual CPU. | |
146 | + | |
147 | +@section Register allocation | |
148 | + | |
149 | +Since QEMU uses fixed simple instructions, no efficient register | |
150 | +allocation can be done. However, because RISC CPUs have a lot of | |
151 | +register, most of the virtual CPU state can be put in registers without | |
152 | +doing complicated register allocation. | |
153 | + | |
154 | +@section Condition code optimisations | |
155 | + | |
156 | +Good CPU condition codes emulation (@code{EFLAGS} register on x86) is a | |
157 | +critical point to get good performances. QEMU uses lazy condition code | |
158 | +evaluation: instead of computing the condition codes after each x86 | |
159 | +instruction, it store justs one operand (called @code{CC_CRC}), the | |
160 | +result (called @code{CC_DST}) and the type of operation (called | |
161 | +@code{CC_OP}). | |
162 | + | |
163 | +@code{CC_OP} is almost never explicitely set in the generated code | |
164 | +because it is known at translation time. | |
165 | + | |
166 | +In order to increase performances, a backward pass is performed on the | |
167 | +generated simple instructions (see | |
168 | +@code{translate-i386.c:optimize_flags()}). When it can be proved that | |
169 | +the condition codes are not needed by the next instructions, no | |
170 | +condition codes are computed at all. | |
171 | + | |
172 | +@section Translation CPU state optimisations | |
173 | + | |
174 | +The x86 CPU has many internal states which change the way it evaluates | |
175 | +instructions. In order to achieve a good speed, the translation phase | |
176 | +considers that some state information of the virtual x86 CPU cannot | |
177 | +change in it. For example, if the SS, DS and ES segments have a zero | |
178 | +base, then the translator does not even generate an addition for the | |
179 | +segment base. | |
180 | + | |
181 | +[The FPU stack pointer register is not handled that way yet]. | |
182 | + | |
183 | +@section Translation cache | |
184 | + | |
185 | +A 2MByte cache holds the most recently used translations. For | |
186 | +simplicity, it is completely flushed when it is full. A translation unit | |
187 | +contains just a single basic block (a block of x86 instructions | |
188 | +terminated by a jump or by a virtual CPU state change which the | |
189 | +translator cannot deduce statically). | |
190 | + | |
191 | +[Currently, the translated code is not patched if it jumps to another | |
192 | +translated code]. | |
193 | + | |
194 | +@section Exception support | |
195 | + | |
196 | +longjmp() is used when an exception such as division by zero is | |
197 | +encountered. The host SIGSEGV and SIGBUS signal handlers are used to get | |
198 | +invalid memory accesses. | |
199 | + | |
200 | +[Currently, the virtual CPU cannot retrieve the exact CPU state in some | |
201 | +exceptions, although it could except for the @code{EFLAGS} register]. | |
202 | + | |
203 | +@section Linux system call translation | |
204 | + | |
205 | +QEMU includes a generic system call translator for Linux. It means that | |
206 | +the parameters of the system calls can be converted to fix the | |
207 | +endianness and 32/64 bit issues. The IOCTLs are converted with a generic | |
208 | +type description system (see @file{ioctls.h} and @file{thunk.c}). | |
209 | + | |
210 | +@section Linux signals | |
211 | + | |
212 | +Normal and real-time signals are queued along with their information | |
213 | +(@code{siginfo_t}) as it is done in the Linux kernel. Then an interrupt | |
214 | +request is done to the virtual CPU. When it is interrupted, one queued | |
215 | +signal is handled by generating a stack frame in the virtual CPU as the | |
216 | +Linux kernel does. The @code{sigreturn()} system call is emulated to return | |
217 | +from the virtual signal handler. | |
218 | + | |
219 | +Some signals (such as SIGALRM) directly come from the host. Other | |
220 | +signals are synthetized from the virtual CPU exceptions such as SIGFPE | |
221 | +when a division by zero is done (see @code{main.c:cpu_loop()}). | |
222 | + | |
223 | +The blocked signal mask is still handled by the host Linux kernel so | |
224 | +that most signal system calls can be redirected directly to the host | |
225 | +Linux kernel. Only the @code{sigaction()} and @code{sigreturn()} system | |
226 | +calls need to be fully emulated (see @file{signal.c}). | |
227 | + | |
228 | +@section clone() system call and threads | |
229 | + | |
230 | +The Linux clone() system call is usually used to create a thread. QEMU | |
231 | +uses the host clone() system call so that real host threads are created | |
232 | +for each emulated thread. One virtual CPU instance is created for each | |
233 | +thread. | |
234 | + | |
235 | +The virtual x86 CPU atomic operations are emulated with a global lock so | |
236 | +that their semantic is preserved. | |
237 | + | |
238 | +@section Bibliography | |
239 | + | |
240 | +@table @asis | |
241 | + | |
242 | +@item [1] | |
243 | +@url{http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/piumarta98optimizing.html}, Optimizing | |
244 | +direct threaded code by selective inlining (1998) by Ian Piumarta, Fabio | |
245 | +Riccardi. | |
246 | + | |
247 | +@item [2] | |
248 | +@url{http://developer.kde.org/~sewardj/}, Valgrind, an open-source | |
249 | +memory debugger for x86-GNU/Linux, by Julian Seward. | |
250 | + | |
251 | +@item [3] | |
252 | +@url{http://bochs.sourceforge.net/}, the Bochs IA-32 Emulator Project, | |
253 | +by Kevin Lawton et al. | |
254 | + | |
255 | +@item [4] | |
256 | +@url{http://www.cs.rose-hulman.edu/~donaldlf/em86/index.html}, the EM86 | |
257 | +x86 emulator on Alpha-Linux. | |
258 | + | |
259 | +@item [5] | |
260 | +@url{http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/usenix-nt97/full_papers/chernoff/chernoff.pdf}, | |
261 | +DIGITAL FX!32: Running 32-Bit x86 Applications on Alpha NT, by Anton | |
262 | +Chernoff and Ray Hookway. | |
263 | + | |
264 | +@end table | |
265 | + | |
266 | +@chapter Regression Tests | |
267 | + | |
268 | +In the directory @file{tests/}, various interesting x86 testing programs | |
269 | +are available. There are used for regression testing. | |
270 | + | |
271 | +@section @file{hello} | |
272 | + | |
273 | +Very simple statically linked x86 program, just to test QEMU during a | |
274 | +port to a new host CPU. | |
275 | + | |
276 | +@section @file{test-i386} | |
277 | + | |
278 | +This program executes most of the 16 bit and 32 bit x86 instructions and | |
279 | +generates a text output. It can be compared with the output obtained with | |
280 | +a real CPU or another emulator. The target @code{make test} runs this | |
281 | +program and a @code{diff} on the generated output. | |
282 | + | |
283 | +The Linux system call @code{modify_ldt()} is used to create x86 selectors | |
284 | +to test some 16 bit addressing and 32 bit with segmentation cases. | |
285 | + | |
286 | +@section @file{testsig} | |
287 | + | |
288 | +This program tests various signal cases, including SIGFPE, SIGSEGV and | |
289 | +SIGILL. | |
290 | + | |
291 | +@section @file{testclone} | |
292 | + | |
293 | +Tests the @code{clone()} system call (basic test). | |
294 | + | |
295 | +@section @file{testthread} | |
296 | + | |
297 | +Tests the glibc threads (more complicated than @code{clone()} because signals | |
298 | +are also used). | |
299 | + | |
300 | +@section @file{sha1} | |
301 | + | |
302 | +It is a simple benchmark. Care must be taken to interpret the results | |
303 | +because it mostly tests the ability of the virtual CPU to optimize the | |
304 | +@code{rol} x86 instruction and the condition code computations. | |
305 | + | ... | ... |